Egy fenomenológiai ellenérv a perdurantizmussal szemben

Abstract

The paper explicates an argument against a perdurantist theory of change. Perdurantism explains change by positing temporal parts in the past, the present, and the future. The aim of the counterargument is to show that this theory is not plausible as a unified model of change: as soon as it is extended to the mind, its direct implication will be the idea that one suffers from radical misunderstanding of how the world appears to him/her. This notion of radical misunderstanding is hard to believe, as a phenomenon is directly accessible to one as a phenomenon.