Ames and Apáczai

the possible theoretical frameworks of eclectic philosophical thinking in 17th century Hungary

Auteurs

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.14232/kulonbseg.2023.23.1.325

Mots-clés :

René Descartes, Hungarian philosophy, William Ames, Puritanism

Résumé

The subject of my research is Apáczai's late summary of natural philosophy, the Philosophia naturalis, written before 1659, and its eclectic philosophical system. My hypothesis is that – instead of creating a conceptually consistent philosophical system – Apáczai was primarily driven by his desire to introduce each of the philosophical traditions that were personally important to him to his students. To do so, he needed to combine the Cartesian ’prima philosophia’ with the traditional ’philosophia naturalis’. This link was provided to him by the Technometry of William Ames, which sought to explore through the concept of ars/techné (craft) the totality of the paths leading to the ars (craft) of God, as it can be discovered in the world created by God. In this way, Apáczai moves from Descartes' concept of cogito and cognition, through Ames's concept of judgement (iudicium), to the cognition of the whole of nature, which is the object of philosophia naturalis, and at the same time the discovery of the ars (craft) of God in the world.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Biographie de l'auteur

Farkas Gábor Kiss

Associate Professor and Head of the Department of Early Hungarian Literature at the Eötvös Lóránd University, Budapest; Senior Researcher of the KnowStudents ERC project hosted by the IFiS PAN (Warszawa). His main research areas are the history of literature and ideas in the 15-17th centuries, especially the history of rhetoric, ars memorativa and encyclopedism. His current project aims at publishing the volume ‘Companion to Humanism in Central Europe: vol. 1., Hungary’ (Berlin, 2024).

Téléchargements

Publiée

2024-03-18

Comment citer

Kiss, F. G. (2024). Ames and Apáczai: the possible theoretical frameworks of eclectic philosophical thinking in 17th century Hungary. KÜLÖNBSÉG (Difference), 23(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.14232/kulonbseg.2023.23.1.325

Numéro

Rubrique

History of Philosophy in Early Modern Hungary